[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070518101133.800db8de.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:11:33 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: clameter@....com, mpm@...enic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, tgraf@...g.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, phillips@...gle.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
Peter wrote:
> cpusets are ignored when in dire straights for an kernel alloc.
No - most kernel allocations never ignore cpusets.
The ones marked NOFAIL or ATOMIC can ignore cpusets in dire straights
and the ones off interrupts lack an applicable cpuset context.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists