[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1abw2105a.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:01:37 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Zou, Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@...el.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Packard, Keith" <keith.packard@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> Eric,
>
> ioapic_level irq is limited, So if we keep vector number not changed
> when imgration to other cpus. It that could help.
We can solve the problem without doing that, and keeping the same
vector number during migration keeps x86 from scaling. Personally
I would prefer to disallow irq migration.
> it will need modify a little with assign_irq_vector and
> irq_complete_move/smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt. because it assume
> vector must be changed.
Yes it does.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists