linux-kernel - Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!

On Fri, 18 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> However we don't have to let those 8 bytes go to waste: we can use them
> to store the virtual address of the page, which kind of makes sense for
> 64-bit, because they can likely to use complicated memory models.

That is not a valid consideration anymore. There is virtual memmap update 
pending with the sparsemem folks that will simplify things.

> Many batch operations on struct page are completely random, and as such, I
> think it is better if each struct page fits completely into a single
> cacheline even if it means being slightly larger.

Right. That would simplify the calculations.
 
> Don't let this space go to waste though, we can use page->virtual in order
> to optimise page_address operations.

page->virtual is a benefit if the page is cache hot. Otherwise it may 
cause a useless lookup.

I wonder if there are other uses for the free space?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/