lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:18:13 -0700 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Zou, Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@...el.com>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>, "Packard, Keith" <keith.packard@...el.com> Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:02:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I will look closer but I do believe that from the ioapic to the cpu the 2.6.21 > code should be fairly robust with respect to inflight messages from the ioapic > to the local apics and the cpus. What I failed to consider were inflight > messages in the other direction arriving out of order. Yes. Inflight messages from cpu to ioapic was what I was referring to. thanks, suresh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists