[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070518.132734.34602464.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: galak@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, matt@...esi-usa.com, sshtylyov@...mvista.com,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, r.schwebel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:31:19 -0500
> I asked this earlier, but figured you might have a better insight.
> Is their value in having 'drivers' for more than one clock source?
> I'd say most (of not all) the PPC SoCs have timers on the system side
> that we could provide drivers for, I'm just not sure if that does
> anything for anyone.
I'm in a similar situation on sparc64, so I'm interested in
this as well :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists