[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464D1E32.6060708@sandeen.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:32:02 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute. compilebench shows the
>>> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of
>>> kernel trees.
>>
>> I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/19/33 ]
>
> Shouldn't that option be renamed to 'corrupt_my_data'? ;-)
It means "I have real storage with battery backed cache and I'd like
good performance, please"
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists