linux-kernel - Re: [Bug 8501] udivdi3 absence with gcc-4.3.0 on kernels 2.6.20.11 & 2.6.22.-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179529943.12981.106.camel@chaos>
Date:	Sat, 19 May 2007 01:12:23 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org" 
	<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	malitzke@...ronets.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 8501] udivdi3  absence with gcc-4.3.0 on kernels
	2.6.20.11 & 2.6.22.-rc1

On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 15:29 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> We use the above idiom in several places.  A suitable fix might be to hunt
> down those various sites and then make them call a helper function which
> does
> 
> 	if (unlikely(ns >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
> 		do_div(...)
> 	}
> 
> (Better would be to inline the comparison and to uninline the do_div(),
> if it's a 32-bit arch.  Doing all this in a backportable fashion may
> prove tricky)

A suitable fix would be to slap the gcc maintainers with a large trout
to fix this nonsense. At least they should provide a command line option
to prevent this extra intelligent optimization.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/