[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070517.222217.112287075.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: npiggin@...e.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:12:38 +0200
> The page->virtual thing is just a bonus (although have you seen what
> sort of hoops SPARSEMEM has to go through to find page_address?! It
> will definitely be a win on those architectures).
If you set the bit ranges in asm/sparsemem.h properly, as I
have currently on sparc64, it isn't bad at all. It's a
single extra dereference from a table that sits in the main
kernel image and thus is in a locked TLB entry.
SPARSEMEM_EXTREME is pretty much unnecessary and with the
virtual mem-map stuff the sparsemem overhead goes away entirely
and we're back to "page - mem_map" type simple calculations
obviating any dereferencing advantage from page->virtual.
> 0.2% of memory, or 2MB per GB. But considering we already use 14MB per
> GB for the page structures, it isn't like I'm introducing an order of
> magnitude problem.
All these little things add up, let's not suck like some other
OSs by having that kind of mentality.
Show me instead a change that makes page struct 8 bytes smaller
:-))))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists