[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070519161732.GA14324@mail.shareable.org>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:17:32 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
David Weinehall wrote:
> > It is also the filesystem that tries to scale logarithmically, as Arnd
> > has noted. Maybe I should call it Log2 to emphesize this point. Log1
> > would be horrible scalability.
>
> So, log2fs... Sounds great to me.
Why Log2? Logarithmic scaling is just logarithmic scaling. Does the
filesystem use 2-ary trees or anything else which gives particular
meaning to 2?
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists