[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705191358560.13309@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 14:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>
cc: sam@...nborg.org, kai@...maschewski.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ip6_tunnel.h to headers_install
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
> The Mobile IPv6 package (http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/software/) needs
> this header file to build the tunnelctl component. The header
> already looks sanitized so is safe to export.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...sta.com>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/Kbuild b/include/linux/Kbuild
> index bcd01f2..e101315 100644
> --- a/include/linux/Kbuild
> +++ b/include/linux/Kbuild
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ unifdef-y += ipc.h
> unifdef-y += ipmi.h
> unifdef-y += ipv6.h
> unifdef-y += ipv6_route.h
> +unifdef-y += ip6_tunnel.h
> unifdef-y += isdn.h
> unifdef-y += isdnif.h
> unifdef-y += isdn_divertif.h
is there some understood standard for naming header files related to
IPv6? currently, there are header files that start with any one of
"ip6_", "ipv6_" and "ip6t_" (although the latter looks like it's
specifically for netfilter stuff).
is there meant to be a distinction between prefixes of "ipv6_" and
"ip6_"?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists