[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705191119010.17008@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, dgc@....com, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] SLUB: add support for kmem_cache_ops
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 5/18/07, clameter@....com <clameter@....com> wrote:
> > kmem_cache_ops is created as empty. Later patches populate kmem_cache_ops.
>
> Hmm, would make more sense to me to move "ctor" in kmem_cache_ops in
> this patch and not make kmem_cache_create() take both as parameters...
Yeah earlier versions did this but then I have to do a patch that changes
all destructors and all kmem_cache_create calls in the kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists