[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464F44BD.3040209@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:41:01 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM : alloc_large_system_hash() can free some memory for
non power-of-two bucketsize
William Lee Irwin III a écrit :
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:54:54AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> alloc_large_system_hash() is called at boot time to allocate space
>> for several large hash tables.
>> Lately, TCP hash table was changed and its bucketsize is not a
>> power-of-two anymore.
>> On most setups, alloc_large_system_hash() allocates one big page
>> (order > 0) with __get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, order). This single
>> high_order page has a power-of-two size, bigger than the needed size.
>> We can free all pages that wont be used by the hash table.
>> On a 1GB i386 machine, this patch saves 128 KB of LOWMEM memory.
>> TCP established hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 393216 bytes)
>
> The proper way to do this is to convert the large system hashtable
> users to use some data structure / algorithm other than hashing by
> separate chaining.
No thanks. This was already discussed to death on netdev. To date, hash tables
are a good compromise.
I dont mind losing part of memory, I prefer to keep good performance when
handling 1.000.000 or more tcp sessions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists