linux-kernel - Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070519223603.8d70cd6e.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 May 2007 22:36:03 +0200
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

El Sat, 19 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com> escribió:

> The chart is at http://www.tmr.com/~davidsen/sched_smooth_01.html for 
> your viewing pleasure. The only "tuned" result was with sd, since what I 
> observed was so bad using the default settings. If any scheduler 
> developers would like me to try other tunings or new versions let me know.

How useful is glxgears as benchmark here? The X.org people has been saying
for ages that "glxgears is not a benchmark". Some people (at least on ubuntu)
even patched it so that if you want to get FPS numbers, you need to pass the
"-iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark" option. There's a good page
explaining why at http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark

I realize that it may be OK for scheduler testing, but maybe it'd be more
interesting to test other kind of 3d benchmark tools.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/