linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <995a4a7a4cada5604be7b30dcce8eb81@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Sun, 20 May 2007 18:02:46 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver

> In fact, while it's never worded explicitely in the spec, it's always
> been strongly in the "spirit" of the architecture that the timebase and
> decrementer have a constant frequency.

The architecture mentions varying time base frequencies,
and how to deal with this, actually.  It makes no
recommendations one way or the other.

Fixed frequencies are easier for almost everything of
course :-)

> This is why processors like the
> 970 allow for an external sourcing for when they are used in setups
> where the various clocks are slewed for power management.

Clock spreading on the core clock is the bigger problem,
lack of accuracy on the order of 1% is unacceptable for
certain applications.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/