[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4650891F.80301@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:03 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement
ata_wait_after_reset()]
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>> Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?
>> Because not all disks spin up without being told to do so and like it or
>> not spinning disks up on resume is the default behavior. As I wrote in
>> the other reply, it would be worthwhile to make it configurable.
>
> Not even after they receive a read command? Ugh.
ATA disks are supposed to spin up, yes. SCSI disks require a command to
tell them to spin up if they're in the "stopped" state.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists