[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179696414.32247.570.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:26:54 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:02 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > In fact, while it's never worded explicitely in the spec, it's always
> > been strongly in the "spirit" of the architecture that the timebase and
> > decrementer have a constant frequency.
>
> The architecture mentions varying time base frequencies,
> and how to deal with this, actually. It makes no
> recommendations one way or the other.
I might be mixing up with PAPR... anyway, it's very stupid to vary it
imho. And as I just said, I have about 0 plan to imlement support for
such a contraption.
> Fixed frequencies are easier for almost everything of
> course :-)
Yup.
> > This is why processors like the
> > 970 allow for an external sourcing for when they are used in setups
> > where the various clocks are slewed for power management.
>
> Clock spreading on the core clock is the bigger problem,
> lack of accuracy on the order of 1% is unacceptable for
> certain applications.
That too.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists