[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4650CABF.9020602@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:25:03 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement
ata_wait_after_reset()]
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007 11:45:03 -0600 Robert Hancock wrote:
>
>> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>>>> Everything seems to work fine without sd_resume(), so why is it needed?
>>>> Because not all disks spin up without being told to do so and like it or
>>>> not spinning disks up on resume is the default behavior. As I wrote in
>>>> the other reply, it would be worthwhile to make it configurable.
>>> Not even after they receive a read command? Ugh.
>> ATA disks are supposed to spin up, yes. SCSI disks require a command to
>> tell them to spin up if they're in the "stopped" state.
>
> Good info, but linux-ide was dropped. Is that due to lack of
> reply-to-all or is it a newsgroup thing or what?
That would be a newsgroup thing. It seems that sometimes CCs get dropped
when the posts are forwarded to fa.linux.kernel where I normally read them.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists