[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464FCA28.9040009@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 06:10:16 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc] increase struct page size?!
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Sat, 19 May 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
>> However, there are numerous optimizations and features made possible
>> with flag bits, which might as could be made cheap by padding struct
>> page up to the next highest power of 2 bytes with space for flag bits.
>
> Well the last time I tried to get this by Andi we became a bit concerned
> when we realized that the memory map would grow by 14% in size. Given
> that 4k page size challenged platforms have a huge amount of page structs
> that growth is significant. I think it would be fine to do it for IA64
> with 16k page size but not for x86_64.
This reminds me Andi attempted in the past to convert 'flags' to a 32 bits field :
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=107903527523739&w=2
I wonder why this idea was not taken, saving 2MB per GB of memory is nice :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists