linux-kernel - Re: something strange in libata-core.c for kernel 2.6.22-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <465161AF.6030002@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 11:09:03 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, l.genoni@...relinux.com,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: something strange in libata-core.c for kernel 2.6.22-rc3

Robert Hancock wrote:
>> Alan, did you have a chance to test the ACPI cable detection?  It just
>> didn't work when I tried it.  It always returned 80c on my machine.
> 
> On a whim I started poking around in the disassembled ACPI DSDT code for
> my Asus A8N-SLI Deluxe board, which is one of these chipsets. The
> original thought was that the STM/GTM trick on these chipsets is
> supposed to allow us to determine what modes we should use based on what
> modes it sets up appropriately. Unfortunately, unless I'm missing
> something in the AML (which is possible) it doesn't seem like there is
> any validation being done on the settings passed in. The settings appear
> to essentially just get programmed into the controller when STM is
> called and read back on GTM.

Yeah, that's consistent to what I've seen on my machine which is a
variant of A8N.  No matter what value I through at _STM, _GTM just
echoed the result thus always leading to 80c configuration.

> I guess this means that what we have to do is trust that the BIOS set up
> a reasonable mode and base the cable detect on that (either by reading
> back the boot-up controller registers, or by calling GTM). I imagine
> this is what the Windows default IDE driver is doing (just using the
> boot-up mode and feeding it back using GTM/STM on suspend/resume cycles).

Alan, what do you think?

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/