| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070521102856.GA20136@gnuppy.monkey.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 03:28:56 -0700 From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:19:46AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was > > released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you > > mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released > > it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the > > same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early > > on, many months ago. > > Yeah, and where do we disagree here again ? So I take it you're disagreeing > with my agreement with you that lockdep came first ? Geez, think about that > one for a bit. (chuckle) :) Yeah, sorry about the wording reversal. It was unintentional. I tend to drop minor words like "not" and stuff which can create confusion. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists