[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46517817.1080208@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:45:06 +0200 (MEST)
From: Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@...heusden.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: signals logged / [RFC] log out-of-virtual-memory events
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> + switch(sig) {
>> + case SIGQUIT:
>> + case SIGILL:
>> + case SIGTRAP:
>> + case SIGABRT:
>> + case SIGBUS:
>> + case SIGFPE:
>> + case SIGSEGV:
>> + case SIGXCPU:
>> + case SIGXFSZ:
>> + case SIGSYS:
>> + case SIGSTKFLT:
>
> Unconditional? That's definitely a very bad idea. If anything only unhandled
> signals should be printed this way because some programs use them internally.
> But I think your list is far too long anyways.
>
> -Andi
>
Maybe you could use somthing similar to unhandled_signal() in
arch/x86_64/mm/fault.c, but I agree that the list seems a bit too long...
-Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists