[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070521210844.c85eb8fe.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:08:44 +0900
From: Komuro <komurojun-mbn@...ty.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces
irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
On Sun, 20 May 2007 15:47:04 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> And how exactly is this related to clock events ?
Maybe, side-effects.
I will re-analyze this problem.
Thanks.
Best Regards
Komuro
> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 19:48 +0900, Komuro wrote:
> > The problem is CPU1 receives 38239 interrupt-16
> > but CPU0 receives only 15 interrupt-16
> > CPU0 should receive more interrupts.
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > 0: 85 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> > 1: 0 698 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 6: 0 5 IO-APIC-edge floppy
> > 8: 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> > 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> > 12: 0 114 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 14: 369 2281 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> > 15: 0 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> > 16: 15 38239 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta, pcnet_cs <<< problem
> > 17: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi yenta
> > NMI: 0 0
> > LOC: 50548 50547
> > ERR: 0
> > MIS: 15503
>
> And how exactly is this related to clock events ?
>
> tglx
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists