linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix section mismatch warnings in mtrr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070521151139.GA1929@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 17:11:39 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix section mismatch warnings in mtrr

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > There was another patch that removed the __init marker to _fix_ section mismatch errors.
> > I have lost the actual mail but I asked the submitter to send me a copy of
> > the configuration so I could take a closer look.
> > Obviously it was the wrong fix to remove the _init marker.
> 
> Hm, I think there were two overlapping patches to address the problem. 
> One removed the __init markers, and was a bit of a hack.  Mine
> restructured all the functions so that it was all done properly (ie,
> init called init; cpuinit called cpuinit).  Looks like both got applied.

OK, then all is good.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/