[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705211202.59817.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:02:59 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@...hat.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
On Monday 21 May 2007 11:36:58 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
> > > earlycon=uart,io,0x3f8,9600n8
> > > earlycon=uart,io,0x3f8,9600n8 console=tty0
> > > earlycon=uart,mmio,0xff5e0000,115200n8
> >
> > Why do we have to have a new "earlycon" argument? Why can't we just
> > parse "console=uart" early?
>
> with console=uart, you need to call early_serial_console_init
> explictly in your arch setup_arch to get early console.
Can't we just do:
early_param("console", setup_early_console);
and have setup_early_console() ignore everything except "uart"?
> with console_initcall(early_uart_console_init), the early_uart_console
> will be called via console_init in start_kernel, init/main.c that is
> not real early console.
I agree that's too late.
Bjorn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists