linux-kernel - Re: + signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070521192551.GA153@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 23:25:51 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	"Davi E. M. Arnaut" <davi@...ent.com.br>
Cc:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call.patch added to -mm tree

A couple of very minor nits,

> +static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, siginfo_t *info,
> +				int nonblock)
> +{
> +	int locked;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +	struct signalfd_lockctx lk;
> +	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> +
> +	locked = signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk);
> +	if (!locked)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
> +	switch (ret) {
> +	case 0:
> +		if (!nonblock)
> +			break;
> +		ret = -EAGAIN;
> +	default:
> +		signalfd_unlock(&lk);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	add_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
> +	for (;;) {
> +		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
> +		if (ret != 0)
> +			break;
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		signalfd_unlock(&lk);

The locking looks a bit overcomplicated. We don't need signalfd_lock() to
check ret != 0 or signal_pending(), we can drop it earlier. This way we
always leave the loop in "unlocked" state.

> +		schedule();
> +		locked = signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk);
> +		if (unlikely(!locked)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Let the caller read zero byte, ala socket
> +			 * recv() when the peer disconnect. This test
> +			 * must be done before doing a dequeue_signal(),
> +			 * because if the sighand has been orphaned,
> +			 * the dequeue_signal() call is going to crash.
> +			 */

Imho, the comment is a bit confusing. dequeue_signal() needs ->siglock
even if signalfd_ctx is not orphaned.

> +			 ret = 0;
> +			 break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
> +	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> +
> +	if (likely(locked))
> +		signalfd_unlock(&lk);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

IOW, how about this?

	static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, siginfo_t *info,
					int nonblock)
	{
		ssize_t ret;
		struct signalfd_lockctx lk;
		DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);

		if (!signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk))
			return 0;

		ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
		switch (ret) {
		case 0:
			if (!nonblock)
				break;
			ret = -EAGAIN;
		default:
			signalfd_unlock(&lk);
			return ret;
		}

		add_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
		for (;;) {
			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
			ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
			signalfd_unlock(&lk);

			if (ret != 0)
				break;

			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
			if (signal_pending(current))
				break;

			schedule();

			ret = 0;
			if (!signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk))
				break;
		}

		remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);

		return ret;
	}

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/