linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Factor out common MODULE_INFO content from module*.h files.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070521045249.GA30018@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 06:52:49 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Factor out common MODULE_INFO content from module*.h files.

> 
> under the circumstances, is there *any* cleanup worth doing WRT to
> this issue?  because of the fact that module.h currently includes
> moduleparam.h, developers have been able to get away with being
> incredibly sloppy in their includes.

It is wortwhile to make module.h independent of moduleparam.h.
The MODULE_INFO stuff has nothing to do with module parameters.

But keep the include so you do not break the > 500 drivers.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/