[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070521233840.GS3429@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:38:40 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>, jeff@...zik.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>, stable@...nel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with
pci_iomap changes
* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@...ux-foundation.org) wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris Wright wrote:
> > ---
> > [chrisw: Why is this not upstream yet?]
>
> And equally importantly, why is it even in the stable queue if it's not
> upstream.
>
> It's against stable rules, and it means that we may have stuff that gets
> fixed in -stable and not in -upstream, if people don't notice. THAT IS
> BAD!
It's there specifically to fish out why it was sent to -stable w/out
ever making it upstream. Having sent the same question w/ no response
5 days ago
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists