linux-kernel - Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179856161.3124.110.camel@drfickle.rchland.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 12:49:21 -0500
From:	Steve Fox <drfickle@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, ak@...e.de, Andy Whitcroft <andyw@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: select(0, ..) is valid ?

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 07:34 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 22.05.2007 [09:16:37 -0500], Steve Fox wrote:
> > 
> > Andy put this through a couple machines on test.kernel.org and elm3b6
> > was fixed, however elm3b239 still had a boot error.
> > 
> > BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
> > 
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff802729c6>] __kmalloc+0xa6/0xe0
> >  [<ffffffff8021d21b>] cache_k8_northbridges+0x9b/0x120
> 
> I believe this is fixed by:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/19
> 
> Care to stack it on top and retest?

Looks good. See the "2.6.22-rc2-git1 +1 +1" row on tko. Thanks.

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/