linux-kernel - Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 19:54:17 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?

Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> When I said "The standard and maintainable way (for drivers at least)
>> is..." I didn't mean the example expression, I meant the *direction* in
>> which the example was stating dependencies.
> 
> In that case I wish "the points" you make on threads are relevant to them.

My initial reply was on a patch which removed the A-to-B declaration of
dependency.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/