[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070522194030.GF12157@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:40:30 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add "notime" boot option
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:09:38PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> --- linux-2622-rc2.orig/kernel/printk.c
> +++ linux-2622-rc2/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -458,9 +458,17 @@ static int __init printk_time_setup(char
> printk_time = 1;
> return 1;
> }
> -
> __setup("time", printk_time_setup);
>
> +static int __init printk_notime_setup(char *str)
> +{
> + if (*str)
> + return 0;
> + printk_time = 0;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("notime", printk_notime_setup);
> +
> __attribute__((weak)) unsigned long long printk_clock(void)
> {
> return sched_clock();
Not disagreeing with the patch, but I wonder if it'd be a net win
if we had a helper that would replace the zillion instances
of "set this variable to a 0/1 depending if its prefixed with 'no'"
with 1-2 lines.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists