[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650705221454k7701cc72g45d4dcc3b535a33e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:54:12 -0500
From: "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jra@...ba.org,
linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org
Subject: Maximum kmem_cache_create size
When using mm/slab.c the maximum size of kmem_cache_created objects
seems to be simply KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. Is it the same thing when using
the version of kmem_cache_create in mm/slub.c?
What are common values of this for different architectures? On this
Intel (Core 2 T7600) system it shows up as 0x800000 which is larger
than I thought it used to be.
Now that Samba 3.0.26pre server supports larger than 128K read
operations, I wanted to be able to allow users to configure (at insmod
time for cifs.ko) the maximum read buffer size supported. I wanted to
be able to set it to a smaller value during cifs_init_request_bufs if
they tried to set it explicitly to something over KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE but
want to make sure that this value applies no matter which version of
kmem_cache_create (slub vs. slab) that they use.
I realize that allocating larger objects could make read performance
worse (fortunately for most cases cifs write does not need to use
large buffers since it can send a page list) so I am leaving the
default request buffer size the same (most servers prefer roughly
16K+sizeof header) - and in any case the RFC1001/1002 length field
only has room for 3 bytes (so 0x800000 is close to the maximum the
protocol would support anyway).
--
Thanks,
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists