linux-kernel - Re: + loop-preallocate-eight-loop-devices.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b040c32a0705211914w3843bd46o542476be97e0b6cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 19:14:50 -0700
From:	"Ken Chen" <kenchen@...gle.com>
To:	"Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + loop-preallocate-eight-loop-devices.patch added to -mm tree

On 5/21/07, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> No, it doesn't.  Really.  It's easy to split; untested incremental to your
> patch follows:
>
>         for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> -               if (!loop_init_one(i))
> -                       goto err;
> +               lo = loop_alloc(i);
> +               if (!lo)
> +                       goto Enomem;
> +               list_add_tail(&lo->lo_list, &loop_devices);
>         }

ah, yes, use the loop_device list_head to link all the pending devices.


> +       /* point of no return */
> +
> +       list_for_each_entry(lo, &loop_devices, lo_list)
> +               add_disk(lo->lo_disk);
> +
> +       blk_register_region(MKDEV(LOOP_MAJOR, 0), range,
> +                                 THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL);
> +
>         printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n");
>         return 0;
> -err:
> -       loop_exit();
> +
> +Enomem:
>         printk(KERN_INFO "loop: out of memory\n");
> +
> +       while(!list_empty(&loop_devices)) {
> +               lo = list_entry(loop_devices.next, struct loop_device, lo_list);
> +               loop_del_one(lo);
> +       }
> +
> +       unregister_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop");
>         return -ENOMEM;
>  }

I suppose the loop_del_one call in Enomem label needs to be split up
too since in the error path, it hasn't done add_disk() yet?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/