linux-kernel - Re: Define CONFIG_BOUNCE to avoid useless inclusion of bounce buffer logic.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 13:39:06 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Define CONFIG_BOUNCE to avoid useless inclusion of bounce
 buffer logic.

On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:

> The bounce buffer logic is included on systems that do not need it.
> If a system does not have zones like ZONE_DMA and ZONE_HIGHMEM that
> can lead to the use of bounce buffers then there is no need to reserve 
> memory pools etc etc. This is true f.e. for SGI Altix.

> +config BOUNCE
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on BLOCK && MMU && (ZONE_DMA || HIGHMEM)
> +

AFAIK, ppc has only ZONE_DMA and it never needs bounce.
Is this ok ?

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/