[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HqnG2-0001WL-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:35:50 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: jblunck@...e.de
CC: viro@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
> > > As for unlink... How do you deal with having that thing
> > > mounted, mounting something _under_ it (so that vfsmount would be kept
> > > busy) and then unlinking that sucker?
> >
> > Yeah, that's a good point. Current patch doesn't deal with that.
> > Simplest solution could be to disallow submounting these. Don't think
> > it makes much sense anyway.
> >
>
> Hmm, think about /your/path/qemu-disk1.img/boot ,
> /your/path/qemu-disk2.img/usr , ...
I get it.
It could probably be done with a little added complexity. For example
when a real mount is attached onto a dir-on-file mount, the
"mountedness" is propagated up to the dentry on the next real mount.
So in that case unlink won't be allowed, even if the immediate
attachment is a dir-on-file mount.
This is tricky to do right though.
Other possibility is to detach all mount trees attached to dentry on
unlink.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists