[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523104122.GF3338@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:11:22 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Shaya Potter <spotter@...columbia.edu>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Blunck <j.blunck@...harburg.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/14] In-kernel file copy between union mounted filesystems
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:35:17AM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote:
> Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >
> >In case of regular files, when we copyup a file, we are actually preventing
> >any writes to the lower layers (which we have designated as read only).
> >
> >Applying the same logic to devices, what do we achieve by copying them up ?
> >How does it matter if we write to the device through a node in the upper
> >layer or in the lower layer. Both the writes eventually do the same thing.
>
> What happens if the lower layer is on a read only medium. But the top
> layer is RW. Why can't one change permissions? In your model, one can't.
>
> What happens if one wants to share a lower layer read-only (I'm doing
> this with my research into uses of union file systems), one doesn't want
> permission change in one use of the lower layer to affect any of the
> other uses.
Ok, makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
So looks like in addition to copyup on open (which is what we do currently)
there is a case for doing copyups for other situations also.
Regards,
Bharata.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists