[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523124013.GV4095@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:40:13 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 08:34:42AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 08:36 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:19:17AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > Eh... Arbitrary limitations are fun, aren't they?
> > >
> > > But these mounts _are_ special. There is really no point in moving or
> > > pivoting them.
> >
> > pivoting - probably true, moving... why not?
>
> Moving would be an implementation artefact that doesn't really
> correspond to any useful operation on the filesyst
>
> AFAIK, most filesystems that have implemented subfiles (excepting
> Reiser4 of course) do not allow you to rename or move the subfile
> directory or its contents from one parent file to another.
If that's about xattr and nothing else, colour me thoroughly uninterested.
If it might have other interesting uses, OTOH...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists