[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523075820.3d9fc3f8@freepuppy>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:58:20 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Houston <mikeserv@...s.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc2
On Tue, 22 May 2007 18:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > It looks like the chip reads the wrong memory sometimes. The problem happens
> > only on the on-board NIC's and only on this kind of motherboard.
>
> Do you know if it happens for particular addresses? (Ie, can you tell what
> the physical address of the descriptor is for the errors?)
I'll look but there didn't seem to be an obvious pattern when I last looked.
>
> > For testing, I have put code in to check that the receive data actually
> > arrived before the IRQ, it triggered on my Gigabyte 925 motherboard. It
> > appears that DMA access is messed up.
>
> Yes, that certainly would also explain memory corruption. Either because
> writes went to the wrong address, or because writes went to the right
> address, but because an earlier IO descriptor read had gotten corrupted,
> the "right address" was in fact the wrong one ;)
>
> The reason I ask whether you have some way of telling the pattern for the
> physical address is that one traditional cause of DMA errors is due to
> broken RAM remapping setup.
>
> As an example of that - imagine that you have 1GB of RAM in the machine,
> and realize that the memory behind the 640kB -> 1MB area isn't accessible,
> because it's taken up by the legacy ISA region.
>
> You have two possible outcomes: either (a) the memory is just "gone", and
> you lost it, or (b) there is some RAM remapping in the core chipset that
> makes the lost 384kB show up _above_ the 1GB mark instead.
>
> The same "legacy ISA" hole situation happens for the "legacy PCI" hole,
> which is why if you have 4GB of RAM in the machine, usually you'll see
> 3GB at addresses 0-3GB (roughly), and then you'll see the rest at above
> the 4GB mark, in order to have a nice PCI hole in the 32-bit access range.
>
> There's also the "legacy 286" hole at the 15-16MB mark (which nobody uses
> any more, but chipsets still inexplicably support), and the SMM remapping.
>
> Anyway, core chipsets generally do CPU memory accesses _differently_ from
> DMA accesses from the PCI bus (at a minimum, SMM is something that only
> the CPU can do), so I could see a situation where the remapping was set up
> correctly for the CPU (and perhaps for "core chipset" devices like the
> integrated southbridge), but devices that do DMA from the outside get
> screwed over.
>
This board doesn't have any onboard video so that helps. I am running
with 2GB of memory.
I can put a card with similar chip in an X1 slot, and there are no
problems. Same driver, but different bridges, and slightly different
Marvell chip.
> But it might not happen for all addresses. Non-remapped stuff might work
> well, so if there is some way of figuring out what the bad DMA address was
> for an erreneous access, that might offer some clues.
>
> > This board has lots of "overclocker" friendly stuff; maybe the BIOS
> > never really sets up the PCI bridges and clocks properly.
>
> It's hard to set up a normal PCI-PCI bridge subtly incorrectly. But
> special RAM timing or remapping stuff for the host bridge - sure.
>
> > It doesn't seem like a software or driver problem. I have tried tweaking PCI
> > registers but nothing worked in this case.
>
> Yeah, the PCI registers that would affect things like this tend to be in
> the host bridge, not on the normal device.
>
> That said, Intel doesn't generally do the really insane things. And a lot
> of the old remapping stuff is simply not done any more. For example, I
> doubt that the 925 chipset even supports remapping the 640k-1M range any
> more: 384kB just isn't worth it when people talk about gigs of RAM, the
> way it was when 16MB was considered a lot.
>
> And looking quickly at the Intel 925X MCH (memory controller hub)
> registers, nothing jumps out as a good candidate for some obvious bug.
>
> Linus
Here is the PCI controller chain to the device:
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: 00005000-00005fff
Memory behind bridge: fff00000-000fffff
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000fff00000-00000000000fffff
Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited
Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported+
Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Port 1
Link: Latency L0s <1us, L1 <4us
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk- ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x0
Slot: AtnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AtnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surpise+
Slot: Number 16, PowerLimit 10.000000
Slot: Enabled AtnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq-
Slot: AttnInd Unknown, PwrInd Unknown, Power-
Root: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- PME-
Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+
Address: fee0300c Data: 4169
Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Unknown device 5001
Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel
Capabilities: [180] Unknown (5)
00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=05, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: 0000a000-0000afff
Memory behind bridge: f8000000-f9ffffff
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 0000000080100000-00000000801fffff
Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited
Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported+
Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Port 5
Link: Latency L0s <256ns, L1 <4us
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk+ ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
Slot: AtnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AtnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surpise+
Slot: Number 20, PowerLimit 10.000000
Slot: Enabled AtnBtn- PwrFlt- MRL- PresDet- CmdCplt- HPIrq-
Slot: AttnInd Unknown, PwrInd Unknown, Power-
Root: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- PME-
Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+
Address: fee0300c Data: 4181
Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Unknown device 5001
Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel
Capabilities: [180] Unknown (5)
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 14)
Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Unknown device e000
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 14
Region 0: Memory at f9000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Region 2: I/O ports at a000 [size=256]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at 80100000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
Capabilities: [5c] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable-
Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [e0] Express Legacy Endpoint IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited
Device: AtnBtn- AtnInd- PwrInd-
Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Port 0
Link: Latency L0s <256ns, L1 unlimited
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 128 bytes CommClk- ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x1
Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists