[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523153718.GB4095@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:37:18 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:25:49PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > How will this work with copy_tree() and namespace duplication, which
> > > currently walk the tree with only namespace_sem held?
> >
> > Easy - grab namespace_sem, grab vfsmount_lock, walk the subtree and bump
> > mnt_busy on everything (by 1 + number of non-busy children). Then drop
> > vfsmount_lock and do as usual, dropping references in tree being copied
> > as you go. Nothing will get attached or detached due to namespace_sem,
> > nothing will get evicted by anybody other than you since you've got all
> > that stuff pinned down. End of story...
>
> Right.
>
> Do you have some code?
>
> Should I try to code something up?
I hope to get some breathing space next week, then I'll get back to
VFS work. I'd rather do that one myself, since it'll be a long series
of equivalent transformations - debugging such rewrite of refcounting
done as a single patch is going to be hell. And yes, refcounting rewrite
is near the top of the list (another thing is wading through several
threads from hell and reviewing unionfs ;-/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists