linux-kernel - RE: [patch 00/69] -stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8E8F647D7835334B985D069AE964A4F7028FE807@ECQCMTLMAIL1.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca>
Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 21:28:34 -0400
From:	"Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <Vincent.Fortier1@...GC.CA>
To:	"Chuck Ebbert" <cebbert@...hat.com>, "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...nel.org>,
	"Justin Forbes" <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	"Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	"Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Chuck Wolber" <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	"Chris Wedgwood" <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	"Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [patch 00/69] -stable review

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org 
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
> Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24
> 
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
> >> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
> >> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :( ...
> > 
> > If only it would fix all of them...
> > 
> > Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
> > 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
> > 2.6.21 was released).
> 
> Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of 
> the bugs haven't appeared.
> 
> Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...

Hi,

If there is a new stable 2.6.20 / 2.6.21, would it be possible that they both contain also this patch to keep the same behaviour between 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 kernels regarding paravirt_ops GPL export?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7

Thnx!

- vin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/