[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79E93560F4A5FD42BB769DAAF8BEF62A01AA8C77@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:53 -0700
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, <clameter@....com>,
<kiran@...lex86.org>, <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] Define new percpu interface for shared data -- version 3
> elements are cacheline aligned. And as such, this differentiates the
local
> only data and remotely accessed data cleanly.
>OK, but could we please have a concise description of the impact
>of these changes on kernel memory footprint? Increase or decrease?
>And by approximately how much?
Depending on how linker places percpu data, the patches could
increase or decrease percpu section size. Data from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2:
On x86 SMP, the section size is increased from 0x7768 to 0x790c.
1.3% increase.
On X86-64 SMP, the size is decreased from 0x72d0 to 0x6540.
11.8% decrease.
On X86-64 VSMP, the size is increased from 0x72d0 to 0x8340.
14.3% increase.
On IA64 SMP, the size is decreased from 0x8370 to 0x7fc0.
2.8% decrease.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists