[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705232233360.10610@anakin>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:38:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...l.org, rmk@....linux.kernel.org, spyro@....com,
starvik@...s.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
chris@...kel.net, uclinux-v850@....nec.co.jp,
kyle@...isc-linux.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Enable arbitary speed tty support
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > +#define TCSETS2 _IOW('T',0x2B, struct termios2)
> > > +#define TCSETSW2 _IOW('T',0x2C, struct termios2)
> > > +#define TCSETSF2 _IOW('T',0x2D, struct termios2)
> >
> > Where is `struct termios2' defined? Right now it doesn't compile because
> > of that.
> >
>
> Sorry, shortage of qualified gnomes: One of them forgot to post this diff first
>
> Add the termios2 structure ready for enabling on most platforms. One or two like
> Sparc are plain weird so have been left alone. Most can use the same structure as
> ktermios for termios2 (ie the newer ioctl uses the structure matching the current
> kernel structure)
Why not `#define termios2 ktermios' (or vice versa) on platforms where
they are the same?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists