lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523212902.GA235@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 01:29:02 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	cpw@....com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hotplug cpu: migrate a task within its cpuset

Cliff Wickman wrote:
>
> In order to do this, move_task_off_dead_cpu() must make a call to
> cpuset_cpus_allowed(), which may block.
>
> move_task_off_dead_cpu() has been within a critical region when called
> from migrate_live_tasks().  So this patch also changes migrate_live_tasks()
> to enable interrupts before calling move_task_off_dead_cpu().
> Since the tasklist_lock is dropped, the list scan must be restarted from
> the top.
>
> [... snip ...]
>
> - * NOTE: interrupts should be disabled by the caller
> + * NOTE: interrupts are not disabled by the caller
>   */
>  static void move_task_off_dead_cpu(int dead_cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> @@ -5008,6 +5008,17 @@ restart:
>  	if (dest_cpu == NR_CPUS)
>  		dest_cpu = any_online_cpu(p->cpus_allowed);
>
> +	/* try to stay on the same cpuset */
> +	if (dest_cpu == NR_CPUS) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Call to cpuset_cpus_allowed may sleep, so we depend
> +		 * on move_task_off_dead_cpu() being called in a non-critical
> +		 * region.
> +		 */
> +		p->cpus_allowed = cpuset_cpus_allowed(p);
> +		dest_cpu = any_online_cpu(p->cpus_allowed);
> +	}

I know nothing about cpuset.c, a _very_ naive question.

Do we really need task_lock() (used by cpuset_cpus_allowed) here ?

If not, probably we can make this simpler. CPU_DEAD takes cpuset_lock(),
move_task_off_dead_cpu() uses guarantee_online_cpus() which doesn't sleep,
so we don't need other changes.

Possible?

If not, this patch should also change migrate_dead(), it still calls
move_task_off_dead_cpu() with irqs disabled, no?

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ