[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070523040650.GS19966@holomorphy.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:06:50 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@...ianpt.org>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 10:28, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> kernel 2.6.21-cfs-v13 2.6.21-ck2
>>> a) 194464 254669
>>> b) 54159 124
>> Everyone seems to like ck2, this makes it look as if the video display
>> would be really pretty unusable. While sd-0.48 does show an occasional
>> video glitch when watching video under heavy load, it's annoying rather
>> than unusable.
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:36:44AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> That's because the whole premise of your benchmark relies on a workload that
> yield()s itself to the eyeballs on most graphic card combinations when using
> glxgears. Your test remains a test of sched_yield in the presence of your
> workloads rather than anything else. If people like ck2 it's because in the
> real world with real workloads it is better, rather than on a yield() based
> benchmark. Repeatedly the reports are that 3d apps and games in normal usage
> under -ck are better than mainline and cfs.
Maybe people should explicitly hack on sched_yield() for these things
and do comparative benchmarking of sched_yield() implementations.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists