[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070524052312.GA2447@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:23:12 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bryan Wu <Bryan.Wu@...log.com>
Subject: Re: how to allow board writers to customize driver behavior (watchdog here)
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:21:47AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> is this completely bad mojo ? is there some other mechanism that
> provides what i want and i just dont know about it ? or do i just
> make people change the driver to fit their application, thus throwing
> out the idea of keeping all board-specific details in just the boards
> file ...
It sounds like your constraining your driver based on terminology.
Watchdogs on most embedded platforms support either a 'reset' mode or
otherwise act as periodic timers, trying to push both of these
functionalities in to a watchdog driver is rather pointless.
CONFIG_WATCHDOG implies 'reset' mode by definition.
If you wish to use your watchdog timer as a periodic timer, simply have a
clocksource/clockevents established for it, leave the watchdog driver as
a reset-only thing, and let the user decide which one they want either
via Kconfig or the kernel command line. (The watchdog driver can just
-ENODEV or -EBUSY if the clocksource is active).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists