linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] limit print_fatal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:37 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@...a.inka.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] limit print_fatal_signal() rate


* Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Actually it seems that SIGKILLs are not printed. In 
> get_signal_to_deliver() we have:
> 
> [snip]
> @@ -1843,6 +1879,8 @@ relock:
>  		 * Anything else is fatal, maybe with a core dump.
>  		 */
>  		current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED;
> +		if ((signr != SIGKILL) && print_fatal_signals)
> +			print_fatal_signal(regs, signr);

yeah. Either i implemented that and forgot, or someone else implemented 
it. :)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/