lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180014338.8303.95.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 09:45:37 -0400
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split
	input/output speed

On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 14:41 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Most people copied the x86 behaviour which makes it easy to transplant.
> Some are just smoking something (see ioctls.h for sh-64 and weep), others
> have slightly odd behaviour for historical compatibility reasons (Sparc)

Likewise, I assume the lack of IBSHIFT on PowerPC is because of AIX?

> > Presumably this is because of the mess in tty_termios_encode_baud_rate
> > when we fix its bogus assumptions about IBSHIFT always being defined?
> 
> It's not a bogus assumption. The current code supports
> 
> 	- The old way
> 	- BOTHER and IBSHIFT
> 
> When PPC wants to do arbitary baud rate it needs to resolve both of the
> definitions together. IBSHIFT is simply the shift you apply to the baud
> bits to get the input baud bits.

Why bother introducing new IBSHIFT stuff when it can be declared
obsolete already -- if you want different input and output baud rates,
just set BOTHER and have different values c_ispeed and c_ospeed.

That's what my patch attempts. It builds but I haven't actually tested
it. Why do you say it won't work?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ