[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070524171404.GC4470@stusta.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:14:04 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING?
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:29:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 23 2007 23:22, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >And we need only two different inline levels (__always_inline and
> >"let the compiler decide"), not three (__always_inline, inline and
> >"let the compiler decide").
>
> "inline" is "let the compiler decide". If it is not, then it is "let the
> compiler decide, based on my bias that I think it should be inlined".
Wrong.
"static" is "let the compiler decide".
> Jan
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists