[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1180026917.3692.47.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:15:17 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@...ptec.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubreylee@...il.com>,
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [scsi] Remove __GFP_DMA
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:00 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > > Going to ensure that we have a 31 bit (not 32 bit) physical address?
> >
> > No, unfortunately. Implementing kmalloc_mask() and kmalloc_dev() was
> > something I said I'd do ... about two years ago.
>
> Tell me more about these ideas.
Oh, it was this Kernel Summit presentation which discussed it
http://licensing.steeleye.com/support/papers/kernel_summit_iommu.pdf
The writeup of the session is here:
http://lwn.net/Articles/144100/
The idea was basically to match an allocation to a device mask. I was
going to do a generic implementation (which would probably kmalloc,
check the physaddr and fall back to GFP_DMA if we were unlucky) but
allow the architectures to override.
However, the majority of need (except for the aacraid like devices) was
solved by GFP_DMA32
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists