linux-kernel - Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070524175307.GA18940@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 10:53:07 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	art@...ltd.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: usb-scanner-cameras kernel-2.6.22 and udev-095 problem

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:00:58PM -0500, art@...ltd.com wrote:
>  greg
> 
>  and part of /etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules
> 
>  ...
>  ACTION!="add", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
>  SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end"
> 
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4100C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0101", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20 (C5101A) | Hewlett-Packard Photosmart S20xi 
>  (C7150A)
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0102", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cxi | 
>  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4200Cse
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0105", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6200C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6250C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0201", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3300c
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0205", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 4300c
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0305", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5200C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0401", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 3400c
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0405", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2100C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0505", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6300C | Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6350C | 
>  Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 6390C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0601", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
>  # Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 2200C
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="03f0", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0605", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> 
>  ...
>  # Dell 1600n
>  SYSFS{idVendor}=="413c", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5250", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
> 
>  LABEL="libsane_rules_end"


I don't see anything odd there at all.

Can you run 'git bisect' to try to narrow down to the patch that caused
the problem?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/