linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070524203653.GA7693@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2007 22:36:53 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF

  Hello,

On Thu 24-05-07 19:05:54, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>   attached is a patch that fixes possible leakage of free blocks / use of
> free blocks in UDF (which spilled nice assertion failures I've added in my
> first round of patches). More details in the changelog. Andrew, please apply.
> Both changes have survived some time of fsx and fsstress testing so they
> should be reasonably safe.
  Sorry for replying to myself but this patch had a minor problem of
printing some bogus warnings when directories were deleted (I wonder why
fsstress didn't find it). Attached is a new version of the patch without
this problem.

									Honza

View attachment "udf-2.6.22-rc2-2-udf_block_leak.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (6946 bytes)